Oregon Ranchers Lose Bid to Eliminate Wild Horses

Newsdate: Fri, 19 July 2013 - 10:55 am
Location: PORTLAND, Oregon

According to the American Wild Horse Preservation website, this past week, the United States Forest Service (FS) entered into a settlement agreement with an Oregon livestock operator by committing to a roundup schedule for wild horses in the Murderers Creek portion of Oregon’s Malheur National Forest in order to bring the population to within the Allowable Management Level (AML) established by the FS.

Wild horses on open land

Wild horses on open land

The National Marine Fisheries Services issued a Biological Opinion finding that wild horses are unlikely to cause measurable impacts to the tributary habitat within the action area.

The settlement is a major blow to the ranchers, Loren and Piper Stout, who hold a permit to graze cattle on public land in the Malheur Forest. The Stouts sought to eliminate or severely reduce the number of wild horses allowed in Murderers Creek, claiming that the horses – and not their cattle – were harming the federally-protected steelhead trout species living in the John Day River that runs through the area.

The Stout’s bid to rid the Malheur Forest of mustangs was dealt a major setback when the National Marine Fisheries Services issued a Biological Opinion earlier this year, finding that, based on the best available scientific evidence, “wild horses are unlikely to cause measurable impacts to [the steelhead’s] tributary habitat within the action area” and impacts due to wild horses “are likely to be small and have minimal impacts on steelhead, [or] their habitat.” 

By contrast, in previous litigation, the Stout’s cattle were found to be directly impacting the steelhead. A federal court in Oregon ordered a reduction in grazing levels, a move that prompted the Stouts to file their own case to eliminate horses from the area.

  “This settlement agreement represents a major victory for wild horse advocates, because it does not attempt to reduce the number of wild horses allowed to live in Murderers Creek – something which, in any event, would not be supported by sound science,” said Suzanne Roy, director of the America Wild Horse Preservation Campaign (AWHPC).

“It also means that the public will still have many future opportunities to participate in Forest Service wild horse roundup decisions for Murderers Creek, pursuant to the the National Environmental Policy Act and other governing laws."

Earlier this year, AWHPC and its coalition partner The Cloud Foundation, along with an Oregonian whose family travels to the Malheur Forest each year to see the horses, sought to participate in the litigation when a trial appeared imminent, and the court granted that request recognizing that the Forest Service does not adequately represent AWHPC’s interests in protecting wild horses. 

However, the groups, who were represented by the Washington, D.C. public interest law firm Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, ultimately did not have to exercise their participation rights, since the threat of AWHPC’s involvement in the lawsuit, coupled with the biological opinion, pressed the ranchers into reaching a settlement agreement and obviating the need for a trial. 

In the wake of the settlement, wild horse advocates are now urging the Forest Service to actively begin humanely managing the Murderers Creek wild horses on the range by utilizing PZP fertility control as an alternative to perpetual roundups and removals.

Last month the National Academy of Sciences issued a highly critical report on the federal wild horse and burro management program, calling “business as usual” “expensive and unproductive.”

The NAS found that holding wild horse populations to unnaturally low levels through a repeated cycle of roundups and removals was actually causing wild horses to reproduce at higher levels and adding to the number of horses stockpiled in holding facilities.

“The Forest Service must begin immediately to manage the Murderers Creek wild horses on the range using humane PZP fertility control,” said Neda DeMayo, president of Return to Freedom, AWHPC’s founding organization.  "The federal government has the technology to minimize wild horse removals by managing horses on their rangelands.

With 50,000 wild horses in government holding facilities, the government must immediately change its business as usual practices -- as recommended by the National Academy of Sciences -- or the threat of slaughter will continue to hang over the heads of warehoused wild horses.”

The American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign is a coalition of more than 50 horse advocacy, public interest, and conservation organizations dedicated to preserving the American wild horse in viable, free-roaming herds for generations to come.

About the Author

Flossie Sellers

Author picture

As an animal lover since childhood, Flossie was delighted when Mark, the CEO and developer of EquiMed asked her to join his team of contributors.

She enrolled in My Horse University at Michigan State and completed a number of courses in everything related to horse health, nutrition, diseases and conditions, medications, hoof and dental care, barn safety, and first aid.

Staying up-to-date on the latest developments in horse care and equine health is now a habit, and she enjoys sharing a wealth of information with horse owners everywhere.

Subscribe