The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has been in consultation with Equine Canada’s Health and Welfare Committee on the issue of Equine Infectious Anemia (EIA) and is developing a new protocol for dealing with this disease.
In 2011, there was a resurgence of EIA positive horses identified in Canada – a total of 179 EIA positive animals were detected. As of November 30, 2011, EIA maps are available on the CFIA website at:
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/disemala/equianem/20110907inde.shtml
EIA continues to be detected in Western Canada, particularly in the northern parts of British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan, as well as in Yukon.
Better control of EIA
Canada is developing a new protocol for dealing with equine infectious anemia cases
There have been more positive cases in December and those maps will be updated very soon. Horses that share a premise with a horse that carries the virus are most likely to become infected.
The CFIA is going to be redesigning the EIA program and one of the fundamental components is going to be encouraging industry to take a more active role in the delivery of the “voluntary” component of the program. CFIA, in conjunction with the horse industry, wishes to develop a program that can become more effective in reducing the presence of this disease.
There is concern that the disease continues to exist in populations that are rarely tested. CFIA is asking the industry to become more involved in encouraging Canada-wide testing.
Following a meeting between the CFIA veterinarians tasked with addressing control of this disease and EC representatives, EC was asked to answer a series of questions. One question asked of us is if industry would like CFIA to perform quarantines on higher risk trace out animals (i.e. those who had been in contact with several known positive horses or in contact with an animal showing clinical signs).
This would mean that all horses that had been exposed under these circumstances in the 30 days prior to the positive test date, would be quarantined on their current premises. The quarantine would be lifted once the exposed animal received a negative test result at least 45 days after the date of the last possible exposure.
The response we received throughout EC was that we were not comfortable with potential quarantining of low risk horses. The reasoning was that we were concerned about the economic impact this would have, often for a low risk transmission situation (such as non- fly season or horses never in close proximity).
However, are we comfortable with CFIA applying quarantine to high risk trace out animals, as specified above? Can we suggest that this should only be applied if the exposure is during a high transmission season or at a barn where the same needle has been used for multiple horses?
Additionally, CFIA has asked Equine Canada to consult with industry on the following approaches (the draft letters which would be issued in these scenarios are further down for your review):
1. If during an investigation, an event where several horses were commingling is identified as being within the 30 day trace back, then instead of CFIA going in and testing all horses that were at said event, we will issue a letter to the organizers and inform them of the potential exposure. The onus will be on them to contact and inform all of their participants of the risk and strongly recommend they follow up with their accredited vet for testing. It has been suggested that this approach only be used for events that DID NOT require a NEG EIA certificate for registration.
This way, those who do testing, are rewarded and the message is clear that the organizers of events and horse owners need to do their part in controlling the spread of the disease. This can be applied to horses that have a lower risk of exposure.Please note: If we are not comfortable with CFIA taking responsibility for high risk horses, this approach would be applied in that circumstance as well.
2. The second letter is for those situations where an individual has been identified during an epidemiological study as being at “high risk” of exposure but they fall outside of our 30 day trace back period. The letter will inform them that their horse(s) has/have potentially been exposed and they should follow up with their accredited veterinarian.
We will be including those who could have been exposed during the previous fly season and this approach will be used for events as well so that people are made aware of the risks. Obviously if during this follow up testing a positive is identified, the CFIA will do the mandatory disease control.
The CFIA will continue to follow up on trace outs; it is just limiting it to those within the 30 days prior to the positive test sampling date. The exception to this would be if there is a commingling event identified within those 30 days.
The proposal is to notify organizers with a letter, as opposed to the CFIA being responsible for testing all horses at the event. If there is a horse identified OUTSIDE of the 30 days but it is considered to be “high risk” due to the circumstances identified during an epidemiological study, then they will also get a notification letter, to follow up with testing with their accredited veterinarian.
We are asking for your feedback on these changes, as well as specific comments on the attached letters, BY Friday, January 27th. We kindly ask that associations summarize their members’ feedback and make one submission. The input we receive will be submitted to the CFIA on your behalf. Please send your comments, by email, to:
For complete details about above proposals, please visit:
http://www.horse-canada.com/horse-news/equine-canada-works-with-the-cfia-to-control-eia/